曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

to which users are subject.
1. EUROCONTROL cost-base per strategic activity
Traditionally, the EUROCONTROL cost-base has
been determined by reference to the source of
financing:
■ cost-base of Parts I and IX, which is included in
the individual cost-base of the 35 Member States
amounting to €492,701,000 in 2005 (graph 1)
■ cost-base of Part III (Maastricht UAC), included
in the costs of the 4 Member States, amounting to
€112,141,000 in 2005 (graph 1)
The total EUROCONTROL cost-base amounts to
€604,842,000 (graph 1).
Following the implementation of the Agency business
plan, the EUROCONTROL cost-base has been
broken down by strategic activity as shown in
graph 2.
2. Cost of Parts I and IX: EATM, CFMU, EEC, IANS,
PRU, SRU, RU and Logistic Services
EUROCONTROL costs (Parts I and IX) accounted in
2005 for 8.5% of the total en-route costs, while in
2004 they accounted for 7.2%. The main reasons for
this increase are the introduction of the new pension
scheme (€63.3 million) and the increased depreciation
(€14.7 million) led by the progressive elimination
of intangible fixed assets.
93
Staff costs
Pension costs
Operating costs
Depreciation
Interest
Total EUROCONTROL costs
% i/i-1
Total en-route costs
%i/i-1
EUROCONTROL portion
2001
141 203
11 037
97 421
79 246
14 046
331 916
4 918 849
6.7 %
2002
168 663
18 330
66 847
96 866
12 821
363 527
9.5%
4 939 938
0.4%
7.4%
2003
176 115
20 022
71 059
108 145
11 561
386 902
6.4%
5 258 573
6.5%
7.4%
2005
192 863
83 953
99 488
107 777
8 620
492 701
22.9%
5 821 863
5.2%
8.5%
Trend of total costs (Parts I and IX) in €‘000
Total EUROCONTROL costs
(€‘000)
Total kilometres flown (million)
Nominal unit cost (€/km)
Inflation factor applied
Real unit cost (€2005/km)
2001
331 916
6 448
0.0515
2.1%
0.0559
2002
363 527
6 415
0.0567
2.2%
0.0590
2003
386 902
6 713
0.0576
2.1%
0.0600
2005
492 701
7 617
0.0647
0.0647
Trend of cost per km (Parts I and IX)
Total costs
(€‘000)
Total number of service units
(million)
Nominal cost (€/service unit)
Inflation factor applied
Real unit cost
(€2005/ service unit)
2001
331 916
82.5
4.02
2.1%
4.37
2002
363 527
82.0
4.43
2.2%
4.72
2003
386 902
87.9
4.40
2.1%
4.58
2005
492 701
99.9
4.93
4.93
2004
188 064
20 672
89 244
93 025
9 749
400 754
3.6%
5 536 640
5.3%
7.2%
2004
400 754
7 186
0.0558
2.0%
0.0569
2004
400 754
94.3
4.25
2.0%
4.33
Trend of costs per service unit (Parts I and IX)
Financial Information
94
The trend in EUROCONTROL charges levied on
airspace users is measured by the following two
variables:
■ the cost per kilometre overflown (which is the
approach adopted by the Performance
Review Unit).
The EUROCONTROL cost per kilometre in
2005 was 6.5 cents per kilometre overflown.
■ the cost per service unit (the combination of
distance and aircraft weight used for charging
purposes).
The EUROCONTROL cost per service unit in the
Route Charges System in 2005 was €4.93.
3. Cost of Part III – Maastricht UAC
In accordance with ICAO rules, the 4 Member
States include their own share of the Maastricht
UAC costs in their individual cost-base. The
increase in Maastricht UAC costs from 2003 to
2004 has been limited to 1.7%, well below the
traffic growth.
4. Cost of Part VI – CEATS
So far, there has been no cost-base for CEATS.
CEATS Member States include in their own costbase
the contributions that they pay to EUROCONTROL
(i.e. €14,088,000 in 2005).
5. Cost of Part II – CRCO
Part II does not generate costs to be charged to
the cost-base of Member States, since the costs
of the CRCO are recovered through a handling
charge levied on every bill recovered through the
system. This charge, which amounts to
€18,106,383 in 2005, is around 0.37% of the
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：EUROCONTROL Annual Report 2005(45)