曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

relate to the same significant point (and therefore are assigned
the same basic indicator), a separate route indicator as
described in 2.1.4 shall be assigned to each route.
4. Assignment of validity indicators
4.1 A validity indicator shall be assigned to each route to
identify the route which is currently in effect.
4.2 The first validity indicator to be assigned shall be the
number “1”.
4.3 Whenever a route is amended, a new validity
indicator, consisting of the next higher number, shall be
assigned. The number “9” shall be followed by the
number “1”.
5. Examples of plain language
and coded designators
5.1 Example 1: Standard departure route — instrument:
a) Plain language BRECON ONE
designator: DEPARTURE
b) Coded designator: BCN 1
5.1.1 Meaning: The designator identifies a standard
instrument departure route which terminates at the significant
point BRECON (basic indicator). BRECON is a radio
navigation facility with the identification BCN (basic indicator
of the coded designator). The validity indicator ONE (1 in the
coded designator) signifies either that the original version of
the route is still in effect or that a change has been made from
the previous version NINE (9) to the now effective version
ONE (1) (see 4.3). The absence of a route indicator (see 2.1.4
and 3.2) signifies that only one route, in this case a departure
route, has been established with reference to BRECON.
5.2 Example 2: Standard arrival route — instrument:
a) Plain language KODAP TWO ALPHA
designator: ARRIVAL
b) Coded designator: KODAP 2 A
5.2.1 Meaning: This designator identifies a standard
instrument arrival route which begins at the significant point
KODAP (basic indicator). KODAP is a significant point
not marked by the site of a radio navigation facility and
therefore assigned a five-letter name-code in accordance with
Appendix 2. The validity indicator TWO (2) signifies that a
change has been made from the previous version ONE (1) to
the now effective version TWO (2). The route indicator
ALPHA (A) identifies one of several routes established with
reference to KODAP and is a specific character assigned to
this route.
5.3 Example 3: Standard departure route — visual:
a) Plain language ADOLA FIVE BRAVO
designator DEPARTURE VISUAL
b) Coded designator: ADOLA 5 B
5.3.1 Meaning: This designator identifies a standard
departure route for controlled VFR flights which terminates at
ADOLA, a significant point not marked by the site of a radio
navigation facility. The validity indicator FIVE (5) signifies
that a change has been made from the previous version FOUR
(4) to the now effective version FIVE (5). The route indicator
BRAVO (B) identifies one of several routes established with
reference to ADOLA.
6. Composition of designators for
MLS/RNAV approach procedures
6.1 Plain language designator
6.1.1 The plain language designator of an MLS/RNAV
approach procedure shall consist of:
a) “MLS”; followed by
b) a basic indicator; followed by
c) a validity indicator; followed by
d) a route indicator; followed by
e) the word “approach”; followed by
f) the designator of the runway for which the procedure is
designed.
6.1.2 The basic indicator shall be the name or name-code
of the significant point where the approach procedure begins.
6.1.3 The validity indicator shall be a number from 1 to 9.
6.1.4 The route indicator shall be one letter of the
alphabet. The letters “I” and “O” shall not be used.
6.1.5 The designator of the runway shall be in accordance
with Annex 14, Volume I, 5.2.2.
Appendix 3 Annex 11 — Air Traffic Services
APP 3-3 1/11/01
6.2 Coded designator
6.2.1 The coded designator of an MLS/RNAV approach
procedure shall consist of:
a) “MLS”; followed by
b) the coded designator or name-code of the significant
point described in 6.1.1 b); followed by
c) the validity indicator in 6.1.1 c); followed by
d) the route indicator in 6.1.1 d); followed by
e) the runway designator in 6.1.1 f).
6.3 Assignment of designators
6.3.1 The assignment of designators for MLS/RNAV
approach procedures shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.
Procedures having identical tracks but different flight profiles
shall be assigned separate route indicators.
6.3.2 The route indicator letter for MLS/RNAV approach
procedures shall be assigned uniquely to all approaches at an
airport until all the letters have been used. Only then shall the
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：附件11 第十三版 第44次修訂(84)