2.5 Reversible Versus Irreversible Errors
Another way of categorising errors is to determine whether they are reversible or irreversible. The former can be recovered from, whereas the latter typically cannot be. For example, if a pilot miscalculates the fuel he should carry, he may have to divert to a closer airfield, but if he accidentally dumps his fuel, he may not have many options open to him.
A well designed system or procedure should mean that errors made by flight crew are reversible. Thus, if a flight crew member incorrectly selects fuel feed which results in an imbalance, the aircraft systems should generate an appropriate alert.

2.6 Slips, Lapses, Mistakes and Violations
Professor Reason highlights the notion of ‘intention’ when considering the nature of error, asking the questions:
.
Were the actions directed by some prior intention?

.
Did the actions proceed as planned?

.
Did they achieve their desired end?

Professor Reason suggests an error classification based upon the answers to these questions as shown in Figure 2.
The most well-known of these are slips, lapses and mistakes.
Slips can be thought of as actions not carried out as intended or planned, e.g. ‘finger trouble’ when dialling in a frequency or ‘Freudian slips’ when saying something.
Lapses are missed actions and omissions, i.e. when somebody has failed to do something due to lapses of memory and/or attention or because they have forgotten something, e.g. forgetting to lower the undercarriage on landing.
Mistakes are a specific type of error brought about by a faulty plan/intention, i.e. somebody did something believing it to be correct when it was, in fact, wrong, e.g. switching off the wrong engine.
Slips typically occur at the task execution stage, lapses at the storage (memory) stage and mistakes at the planning stage.
Violations sometimes appear to be human errors, but they differ from slips, lapses and mistakes because they are deliberate ‘illegal’ actions, i.e. somebody did something knowing it to be against the rules (e.g. deliberately failing to follow proper procedures). A pilot may consider that a violation is well-intentioned, e.g. electing not to climb in response to a TCAS RA, if he is certain that the other aircraft has already initiated avoiding action. There is great debate about whether flight crew should follow SOPs slavishly, or should elect to diverge from SOPs from time to time. Whatever the case, and however well intentioned, this would still technically constitute a 'violation' rather than an error.

Figure 2 Error types base on intention. Source: Reason, 1990

2.7 Skill-, Rule- and Knowledge-Based Behaviours and Associated Errors
Human behaviour can generally be broken down into three distinct categories: skill-based, rule-based and knowledge-based behaviour. These are covered in greater detail in Professor James Reason's book "Human Error".
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CAP 737 Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training 機組資源管理培訓(59)