曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

FDPS upgrades & replacements
Figure 133: FDPS system upgrades and planned replacements
9.6.19 Notwithstanding the uncertainties attached to the current air traffic forecasts, it is
important to continue to close existing capacity gaps and to carefully plan future capacity
increases and system upgrades in order to be able to accommodate future traffic demand
without costly service quality penalties.
9.6.20 A proactive capacity planning and management is especially important considering the
fact that structural decisions concerning capacity (recruitment, investment, major airspace
redesign, and operational agreements within FABs) typically have an operational effect
after 3-5 years.
SINGLE EUROPEAN SKY PERFORMANCE SCHEME
9.6.21 The SES Performance Scheme is designed to be a powerful driver of European ANS
performance. The Scheme will include European Union wide targets in four key
performance areas (Safety, Cost-efficiency, Capacity, and Environment) which are
transposed into binding national/FAB targets for which clear accountabilities must be
assigned.
9.6.22 The first reference period of the SES II performance scheme starting in 2012 will mark a
significant change for European ANS performance and it is important to ensure the
development of sound and relevant key indicators which serve as a foundation for target
setting (see also Chapter 8).
55 The upgrades are partly necessary due to changes in the ICAO flight plan format.
PRR 2009 118 Chapter 9: Economic Assessment
SINGLE EUROPEAN SKY ATM RESEARCH (SESAR)
9.6.23 The SES II package also includes a technological pillar (see also Chapter 1.3.). The
SESAR programme constitutes the R&D branch of the European SES initiative. As such
it should deliver technological solutions and operational concepts and outline expected
costs and benefits before decisions on the implementation are taken.
9.6.24 For the benefit of the entire European aviation community, it will be important to ensure
consistency and close coordination between ANS performance review in Europe and
developments within SESAR.
9.7 Conclusions
9.7.1 The indicators related to ANS performance at airports are not yet available with a
sufficient level of precision and therefore the economic assessment is limited to en-route
ANS. Work is needed to include ANS performance at airports in the economic
assessment as soon as possible. This is particularly important in the context of the SES II
performance scheme.
9.7.2 With the exception of safety where minimum agreed levels must be guaranteed, it is
important to develop a consolidated view in order to monitor overall economic
performance for those KPAs for which economic trade-offs are possible (costs related to
capacity provision vs. costs associated with service quality).
9.7.3 The significant improvements observed for direct en-route ANS costs between 2004 and
2008 were almost cancelled-out by increases in en-route ATFM delays and en-route
extension. This indicates the importance of managing the entire system performance.
9.7.4 Notwithstanding an increase of the unit costs for en-route ANS capacity provision in
2009, total economic en-route unit costs show a significant decline (-6%) due the
reduction of en-route ATFM delays and flight efficiency improvements which were to a
large extent driven by the significant reduction of traffic in 2009.
9.7.5 The first reference period of the SES II performance scheme starting in 2012 will mark a
significant change for European ANS performance and it is important to ensure the
development of sound and relevant key indicators which serve as a foundation for target
setting.
119
ANNEX I - SES II PERFORMANCE SCHEME
Article 11 of the Framework Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, as amended by
Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 of 21 October 2009
Article11
Performance scheme
1. To improve the performance of air navigation services and network functions in the
single European sky, a performance scheme for air navigation services and network
functions shall be set up. It shall include:
(a) Community-wide performance targets on the key performance areas of safety, the
environment, capacity and cost-efficiency;
(b) national plans or plans for functional airspace blocks, including performance
targets, ensuring consistency with the Community-wide performance targets; and
(c) periodic review, monitoring and benchmarking of the performance of
air navigation services and network functions.
2. In accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 5(3), the Commission
may designate Eurocontrol or another impartial and competent body to act as a
"performance review body". The role of the performance review body shall be to assist
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Performance Review Report 2009(85)