曝光臺 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

preventing accidents in the air and reducing the volume of serious
incidents with a direct or indirect ATM system contribution was
PANSA’s crucial objective. When compared to the year before,
2008 saw no air accident with a direct or indirect ATM system
contribution and the rate of serious air incidents per 100 000
aircraft movements was almost twice lower totalling 0.502 in 2008
(cf.: 0.919 in 2007).
(Extract from ANSP's 2008 annual report).
In 2009 PANSA has reached the strategic safety objective –
to improve safety levels by ensuring that number of ATM
induced accidents and serious incidents do not increase and
where possible, decrease, irrespective of air traffic rise.
There were no accidents with a direct or indirect ATM
contribution. In 2009 the safety indicator has been calculated
as the total ATM related incidents category A and B per
100.000 movements per year was 0,461. In comparison with
2008 (0.545), the result show positive direction and
decrease of the value about 18 %.
(source: PANSA)
PANSA, Poland
Delay per
arrival flight
Arrival flights
('000)
Delay ('000 min)
Delay per
delayed flight
Arrival flights
('000)
Delay per
arrival flight
En Route ATFM delay
Warszawa
0
1
2
3
4
5
Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov
60
110
160
210
2006 2007 2008 2009F
ATM/CNS provision Costs
Composite flight hours
in €2008 per hour
64 68 86
2006 2007 2008
in €2008 per hour
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2006 2007 2008 2009F
in flights per day
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Dec
Jan
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
IFR Flights Seasonal variation Complexity
Low
Employment Cost
per ATCO hour
Support Cost per
comp. flight hour
Productivity
composite flight hour
per ATCO hour
En route ATFM delay per flight En route ATFM delay
in minute per flight
High
ATM/CNS provision Costs
in €2008 per hour
207 204 255
2006 2007 2008
0.82 0.86 0.93
2006 2007 2008
per composite flight hour
Days with en route delay
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2006 2007 2008 2009
0
1
2
3
Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov
Weather Other
ATFM Delay per arrival flight
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2006 2007 2008 2009
ATFM Delay per arrival flight Airports with ATFM Delay
per flight > 1 minute
in days ACC(s)
in minute per flight in minute per flight
Peak Week / Avg Week = 116%
Avg
All Airports All Airports
in thousand flights
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2006 2007 2008 2009
+13% +10% -7%
index 100 in 2006
Traffic Key data 2007 2008 2009(F)
Total IFR flights controlled ('000) 432 444 434
IFR flight-hours controlled ('000) 261 271 264
IFR airport movements controlled ('000) 144 159 168
En Route ATFM delays ('000 minutes) 0 0 0
Airport ATFM delays ('000 minutes) 0 1 0
Total Staff 1859 1723
ATCOs in OPS 530 523 549*
ATM/CNS provision costs (million €2008) 133 160 146*
Capital Investment (million €2008) 24 19 15*
* Forecast
ROMATSA, Romania
Delay ('000 min)
Delay per
delayed flight
En Route ATFM delay
Safety
Cost effectiveness
ESARR 2 severity classification.
The safety goal of Romatsa for 2008 was achieved.
(Extract from ANSP's 2008 annual report).
Days with
delays>1m
% flights
delayed
ACC
Bucuresti □ 0 0.0% 0
Delay per
arrival flight
Arrival flights
('000)
Arrival flights
('000)
Delay per
arrival flight
Airport ATFM delay
Airport
A - 33
Bucuresti
0
1
2
3
4
5
Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov
60
70
80
90
100
110
2006 2007 2008 2009F
ATM/CNS provision Costs
Composite flight hours
in €2008 per hour
45 50 59
2006 2007 2008
in €2008 per hour
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2006 2007 2008 2009F
in flights per day
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Dec
Jan
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
　
中國航空網(wǎng) m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Performance Review Report 2009(116)