曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

Figure 10: Yearly traffic variation per charging area
2.3.2 Figure 11 shows the charging areas with the highest variations in terms of absolute
movements (overflights, international and domestic traffic). Year on year, the United
Kingdom, Germany and France showed the highest drop in actual movements. Of the
Annual growth in IFR Movements 2008
Below 0%
0% to 3%
3.% to 6%
6% to 9%
9% to 12%
Above 12%
Azores Canarias data source : EUROCONTROL/STATFOR
2
PRR 2009 Chapter 2: Traffic
8
seven countries with a positive growth in terms of absolute movements, only growth in
Turkey is not due totally to overflights.
-11% -7%
4%
3% 9% 3% 7% 1% 0%
-9%
-7% -7%
-10%
-9% -8% -5% -8%
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
Turkey
Serbia and Montenegro
Albania
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Moldova
Malta
Croatia
UK
Germany
France
Spain
Netherlands
Austria
Italy
Belgium/Lux.
Sweden
Switzerland
Variation in movements 2009 vs 2008 (per day)
-500%
-400%
-300%
-200%
-100%
0%
100%
Overflight
International
Internal
% Movement Growth
data source : EUROCONTROL/STATFOR
TOP INCREASE TOP DECREASE
Figure 11: Largest traffic variation per charging area in terms of movements
2.3.3 Figure 12 shows the top 20 airports in term of movements (departures plus arrivals). The
figure shows that 18 out of the top 20 airports have lost traffic. Traffic only increased in
Athens and Istanbul (+7% and +4% respectively). The average variation of traffic at the
top 20 airports is -7% which is in line with the total traffic decrease.
-6%
-2% -4% -7%
-9% -8%
-6% -13%
4% -10%
-5% -10% -11%
-4% -8% -6% 7% -13%-14%
-4%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Paris/Charles-De-
Gaulle
London/Heathrow
Frankfurt
Madrid/Barajas
Amsterdam
Munich
Rome/Fiumicino
Barcelona
Istanbul/Ataturk
Vienna
London/Gatwick
Zurich
Copenhagen/Kastrup
Brussels
Paris/Orly
Oslo/Gardermoen
Dusseldorf
Athens
Stockholm/Arlanda
Milan/Malpensa
Airport movements per day
2009 2008
data source : EUROCONTROL/CFMU
Figure 12: Movements at the top 20 airports
2.3.4 Figure 13 shows airports with largest absolute variations in movements. For the top 10
airports showing an increase in traffic movements, many of these airports are served by
“low cost” carriers. 2009 shows significant decreases in traffic at main airports (see also
Figure 24 - Peak day and average daily traffic).
2
PRR 2009 Chapter 2: Traffic
9
38%
7%
4%
34% 54%
11% 9% 39% 49% 14%
-13%
-9%
-8% -7% -6% -16%-15% -13%-14% -10%
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Sabiha Gokcen (LT)
Athens (LG)
Istanbul Ataturk (LT)
Charleroi (EB)
Niederrhein (ED)
Riga (EV)
Berlin Schoenefeld (ED)
Reus (LE)
Zadar (LD)
Bucuresti Baneasa (LR)
Barcelona (BCN)
Amsterdam (AMS)
Munich (MUC)
Madrid (MAD)
Paris (CDG)
Dublin (DUB)
Manchester (MAN)
Stockholm (ARN)
Milan/Malpensa (MXP)
Vienna (VIE)
Variation in airport movements 2009 vs 2008 (per day)
-500%
-400%
-300%
-200%
-100%
0%
100%
Airport Movements
% Movement Growth data source : EUROCONTROL/CFMU
TOP 10 INCREASE TOP 10 DECREASE
Figure 13: Airports with largest variation in average daily movements
2.4 Traffic forecasts
2.4.1 Traffic is in line with the short term forecast published in Feb 2009 (-5%, with wide
uncertainty -1.5% to -8% as a consequence of the global financial crisis and economic
downturn).
2.4.2 In the medium term, forecast traffic growth is quite contrasted across Europe, as
illustrated in Figure 14, with highest relative growth expected in Eastern Europe.
Figure 14: STATFOR Medium Term Forecast (dated Feb. 2010)
2
PRR 2009 Chapter 2: Traffic
10
2.4.3 EUROCONTROL’s updated medium term traffic forecast (dated Feb.2010) is shown in
Figure 15.
-5
0
5
10
15
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Performance Review Report 2009(18)