曝光臺(tái) 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營(yíng)店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

The Committee met for the first time in
September 2002 under the Chairmanship of Ole
Asmussen. In December 2003, seven meetings
later, its main achievements are:
 the development of the EUROCONTROL Regulatory
and Advisory Framework (still to be submitted
to the Provisional Council for adoption);
 the development and execution of the first
EUROCONTROL Regulatory Work Programme;
 the launch of several formal consultations,
ADVISORY
BODIES
using the EUROCONTROL Notice of Proposed
Rule-Making (ENPRM) process, on:
– a EUROCONTROL Rule for Airspace
Classification;
– an Advanced ENPRM Consultation on
Aeronautical Data End-to-End Integrity;
– a EUROCONTROL Informative Process on
the Common Framework for the Regulation
of Mode S Enhanced Surveillance;
– an advanced ENPRM on Air Traffic Flow
Management.
During the year, and with the support of the
Regulatory Unit (RU), the RC also established relationships
with international organisations, including
the International Civil Aviation Organization
(ICAO), the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA), the
International Air Transport Association (IATA), the
Association of European Airlines (AEA) and the
International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers
Associations (IFATCA). Within EUROCONTROL, the
RC established working relationships with such
bodies as the Civil and Military Interface standing
Committee (CMIC), the Chief Executive Standing
Conference (CESC), the Safety Regulation
Commission (SRC) and the ATM/CNS Consultancy
Group (ACG).
Within its first year of operation, the Regulatory
Committee directed its regulatory work towards
the following priority areas:
15
PAGE
EUROCONTROL Annual Report 2003
16
PAGE
 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM);
 Airspace and Navigation;
 Performance and Interoperability.
Now that the EUROCONTROL regulatory structures
and working methods have been put in
place and the EUROCONTROL Regulatory Work
Programme has been actively started, the
Regulatory Committee is determined to make an
active contribution to the implementation of the
Single European Sky by supporting the development
of relevant implementing rules.
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Performance Review Commission
The Performance Review Commission (PRC) was
established in 1998. It advises the governing
bodies of EUROCONTROL on the development of
a strong, transparent and independent performance
review and target-setting system. This system
addresses all aspects of air traffic management
including policy and planning, safety management
at and around airports and in airspace,
as well as financial and economic aspects of the
air traffic services provided.
In 2003, the PRC held six meetings under the
chairmanship of Mr Keith Williams. It submitted
three reports to the EUROCONTROL Commission
through the Provisional Council, namely:
PRR6
The sixth Performance Review Report (PRR 6)
addresses the performance of the European ATM
system in four key performance areas (safety,
delays, cost-effectiveness and flight efficiency)
and trade-offs between these areas.
It updates and confirms results of the initial USEurope
comparison published in PRR 4 (2001),
and gives a summary of a detailed comparison of
selected US and European en-route centres (see
US/Europe Report).
An open consultation meeting was held with
interested parties on 19 May 2003.
ACE 2001 REPORT
All EUROCONTROL Member States are required
to ensure that their air navigation service
providers supply the PRC with information on a
yearly basis, in conformity with the EUROCONTROL
"Specification for Information
Disclosure". The PRC published its first ATM
cost-effectiveness Benchmarking Report (ACE
2001) in September 2003.
ACE 2001 focuses on the cost-effectiveness of air
navigation and aeronautical meteorology services.
It describes productivity at both air navigation
service providers and ACC levels.
US/EUROPE REPORT
A detailed comparison of selected US and
European en-route centres was conducted in
close cooperation with the US Federal Aviation
Administration and concerned air navigation service
providers in order to determine the extent to
which the significant cost-effectiveness differences
identified between the two ATM systems
arose from differences in the performance of individual
control centres. The report gives a detailed
breakdown of ACC cost-effectiveness into productivity,
　
中國(guó)航空網(wǎng) m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：EUROCONTROL Annual Report 2003(5)