曝光臺 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

of a specific approval. For example, certain portions of
the operations manual may be “accepted” by formal instrument,
while other portions such as the aircraft-specific minimum
equipment list are “approved” by a separate formal
instrument.
4.2 Conformance Report
Some States use a conformance report to document the acceptances
it makes with regard to a particular operator. This is a
document submitted by the operator detailing how, with
specific references to operations or maintenance manuals, it
will comply with all applicable State regulations. This type of
document is referenced in Doc 8335, 3.3.2 e) and the Airworthiness
Manual (Doc 9760), Volume I, 6.2.1 c) 4). Such a
conformance report should be actively used during the certification
process and revised as necessary to reflect modifications
required by the State in the operator’s policies and
procedures. Then a final conformance report is included in the
State’s certification records, along with other records of certification.
The conformance report is an excellent method of
demonstrating that the operator was properly certificated with
respect to all applicable regulatory requirements.
4.3 Operations and maintenance manuals
4.3.1 Operations and maintenance manuals, and any subsequent
amendments should be submitted to the State (2.2.2.2,
6.1.1, 6.2.4, 6.3.2). The State also establishes minimum contents
for these manuals (9.2, 9.3, 9.4 and Appendix 1). The
pertinent portions of an operator’s manual for evaluation
should be identified in the State’s technical guidance, e.g.
operations policy manual, aircraft operating manual, cabin
crew manual, route guide, and training manual. Some States
issue a formal instrument accepting each manual and any subsequent
amendments.
4.3.2 The State’s technical evaluation should, in addition
to ensuring that all required contents are addressed, consider if
the specific policies and procedures would result in the desired
outcome. For example, the specifications for the operational
flight plan (Appendix 1, 2.1.15) should provide the
step-by-step completion guidance necessary for compliance
with 2.3 concerning the content and retention of these plans.
4.3.3 Proven industry practices, such as an example of an
actual completed operational flight plan for reference by the
flight crew and dispatchers (although not a Standard), may
also be required by a State’s technical evaluator during certification.
This aspect of the technical evaluation should be conducted
by inspectors experienced in operator certification. A
major consideration with respect to evaluating for proven
industry practices that are aircraft-specific, equipment-specific
or have limited applications is the employment of evaluators
who are currently qualified in the practice to be evaluated.
5. Other approval or acceptance considerations
Some States provide for approval or acceptance of certain critical
documents, records or procedures specified in this Part
although the relevant Annex 6 Standards do not require
approval or acceptance by the State of the Operator. The following
are some examples:
a) safety programme (1.1.9);
b) method for obtaining aeronautical data (2.1.1);
c) adequacy of the fuel and oil records (2.2.8);
d) adequacy of flight time, flight duty and rest period
records (2.2.9.3, 7.6, 10.4);
Attachment F Annex 6 — Operation of Aircraft
ATT F-5 12/31/111/0/016
No. 11
e) adequacy of the aircraft maintenance logbook (2.3.1
a), b), and c));
f) adequacy of the load manifest (2.3.1 d), e) and f));
g) adequacy of the operational plan (2.3.1 g));
h) method for obtaining weather data (2.3.5.1 and
2.3.5.2);
i) method of compliance with carry-on baggage stowage
(2.7);
j) helicopter performance operating limitations (3.2.4);
k) method of obtaining and applying heliport obstacle
data (3.3);
l) adequacy of passenger information cards (4.2.2 d));
m) procedures for long-range navigation (5.2.1 b));
n) contents of the journey log book (9.4); and
o) content of the security training programme (11.2).
6. Validation of Standards of Operations
Standard 2.2.1.5 requires that the validity of an AOC shall
depend upon the operator maintaining the original certification
standards (2.2.1.4) under the supervision of the State of the
Operator. This supervision requires that a system of continued
surveillance be established to ensure the required standards of
operations are maintained (2.2.1.7). A good starting point in
the development of such a system is to require annual or
　
中國航空網(wǎng) m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：附件6--航空器的運行an06_P3_5ed_amend_11(47)