2.  
The approval should be based upon the organisational capability relative to M.A. Subpart F compliance and not limited by reference to individual EASA certificated products.

For example, if the organisation is capable of maintaining within the limitation of
M.A. Subpart F the Cessna 100 series aircraft the approval schedule should state A2 Cessna 100 series and not Cessna 172 RG which is a particular designator for one of many Cessna 100 series.
AMC M.B.603 (c) Issue of approval
The numeric sequence of the approval reference should be unique to the particular approved maintenance organisation.
Section B
PART-M
Subpart F

M.B.604 Continuing oversight
(a)
The competent authority shall keep and update  a program listing for each M.A Subpart F approved maintenance organisations under its supervision, the dates when audit visits are due and when such visits were carried out.

(b)
Each organisation shall be completely audited at periods not exceeding 24 months.

(c)  
All findings shall be confirmed in writing to the applicant organisation.

(d)
The competent authority shall record all findings, closure actions (actions required to close a finding) and recommendations.

(e)
A meeting with the accountable manager shall be convened at least once every 24 months to ensure he/she remains informed of significant issues arising during audits.

AMC M.B.604 (b) Continuing oversight
1.  
Where the competent authority has decided that a series of audit visits are necessary to arrive at a complete audit of an approved maintenance organisation, the program should indicate which aspects of the approval will be covered on each visit.

2.  
It is recommended that part of an audit concentrates on the organisations internal self monitoring reports produced by the organisational review to determine if the organisation is identifying and correcting its problems.

3.  
At the successful conclusion of the audit(s) including verification of the manual, an audit report form should be completed by the auditing surveyor including all record-ed findings, closure actions and recommendation. An EASA Form 6F should be used for this activity.

4.  
Credit may be claimed by the competent authority surveyor(s) for specific item audits completed during the preceding 23-month period subject to four conditions:

(a)
the specific item audit should be the same as that required by M.A. Subpart F latest amendment, and

(b)
there should be satisfactory evidence on record that such specific item audits were carried out and that all corrective actions have been taken, and

(c)  
the competent authority surveyor(s) should be satisfied that there is no reason to believe standards have deteriorated in respect of those specific item audits being granted a back credit;

(d)
the specific item audit being granted a back credit should be audited not later than 24 months after the last audit of the item.

5.  
When performing the oversight of organisations that hold both M.A. Subpart F and

M.A. Subpart G approvals, the competent authority should arrange the audits to cover both approvals avoiding duplicated visit of a particular area.
ED 2008/013/R
Section B
PART-M
Subpart F

M.B.605 Findings
(a)
When during audits or by other means evidence is found showing non-compliance to the Part-M requirement, the competent authority shall take the following actions:

1.  
For level 1 findings, immediate action shall be taken by the competent authority to revoke, limit or suspend in whole or in part, depending upon the extent of the level 1 finding, the maintenance organisation approval, until successful correc-tive action has been taken by the organisation.
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(8)