(i)  
that the changes remain minor and

(ii)
that it has an adequate control over the approval of the changes to ensure they remain in compliance with the requirements of this Annex (Part-M);

AMC M.B.706 Changes
1.  
Changes in nominated persons

The competent authority should have adequate control over any changes to the per-sonnel specified in M.A.706 (a), (c), (d) and (i). Such changes will require an amend-ment to the exposition.

2.  
It is recommended that a simple exposition status sheet is maintained which contains information on when an amendment was received by the competent authority and when it was approved.

3.  
The competent authority should define the minor amendments to the exposition which may be incorporated through indirect approval. In this case a procedure should be stated in the amendment section of the approved continuing airworthi-ness management exposition.

Changes notified in accordance with M.A.713 are not considered minor.
For all cases other than minor, the applicable part(s) of the EASA Form 13 should be used for the change.
4.  The approved continuing airworthiness management organisation should submit each exposition amendment to the competent authority whether it be an amendment for competent authority approval or an indirectly approved amendment. Where the amendment requires competent authority approval, the competent authority when satisfied, should indicate its approval in writing. Where the amendment has been submitted under the indirect approval procedure the competent authority should acknowledge receipt in writing.
ED 2008/013/R  ED 2010/002/R
Section B
PART-M
Subpart G

M.B.707 Revocation, suspension and limitation of an approval
The competent authority shall:
(a)
suspend an approval on reasonable grounds in the case of potential safety threat, or;

(b)
suspend, revoke or limit an approval pursuant to M.B.705.

EC 1056/2008
SUBPART I
AIRWORTHINESS REVIEW CERTIFICATE

M.B.901 Assessment of recommendations
Upon receipt of an application and associated airworthiness review certificate recom-mendation in accordance with M.A.901:
1.  
Appropriate qualified personnel from the competent authority shall verify that the compliance statement contained in the recommendation demonstrates that a com-plete M.A.710 airworthiness review has been carried out.

2.  
The competent authority shall investigate and may request further information to support the assessment of the recommendation.

AMC M.B.901 Assessment of recommendations

1.  
The result of the verification and the investigation of a recommendation should be sent to the applicant within 30 days. If corrective action has been requested before the issuance of an airworthiness review certificate, the competent authority may decide a further period for the assessment of the requested corrective action.

2.  
The verification of the compliance statement required by M.B.901 does not mean repeating the airworthiness review itself. However the competent authority should verify that the M.A. Subpart G organisation has carried out a complete and accurate assessment of the airworthiness of the aircraft.

3.  
Depending on the content of the recommendation, the history of the particular air-craft, and the knowledge of the M.A.Subpart G organisation or M.A.901(g) certifying staff making the recommendation in terms of experience, number and correction of findings and previous recommendations the extent of the investigation will vary. Therefore, whenever possible the person carrying out the investigation should be involved in the oversight of the M.A.Subpart G organisation making the recommen-dation.

4.  
In some cases, the inspector may decide that it is necessary to organise: -a physical survey of the aircraft, or; -a full or partial airworthiness review. In this case, the inspector should inform the M.A.Subpart G organisation or
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(14)