曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

1.  
The competent authority should not expect the documents listed in M.B.701 (a) to be submitted in a completed state with the initial application for grant or change since each may require approval in its own right and may be subject to amendment as a result of competent authority assessment during the technical investigations. Draft documents should be submitted at the earliest opportunity so that investigation of the application can begin. Grant or change cannot be achieved until the competent authority is in possession of completed documents.

2.  
This information is required to enable the competent authority to conduct its inves-tigation, to assess the volume of maintenance work necessary and the locations at which it will be accomplished.

3.  
The applicant should inform the competent authority where base and scheduled line maintenance is to take place and give details of any contracted maintenance which is in addition to that provided in response to M.A.201 (h) 2 or M.A.708 (c).

4.  
At the time of application, the operator should have arrangements for all base and scheduled line maintenance in place for an appropriate period of time, as accepted to the competent authority. The operator should establish further arrangements in due course before the maintenance is due.

Base maintenance contracts for high-life time checks may be based on one time con-tracts, when the competent authority considers that this is compatible with the opera-tor’s fleet size.

ED 2010/002/R  ED 2010/002/RED 2008/013/R
AMC M.B.702 (a) Initial approval
1.  
‘Formally indicate in writing’ means that an EASA Form 4 should be used for this activity. With the exception of the accountable manager, an EASA Form 4 should be completed for each person nominated to hold a position required by M.A.706 (c) (d) and M.A.707.

2.  
In the case of the accountable manager, approval of the continuing airworthiness management exposition containing the accountable manager’s signed commitment statement constitutes formal acceptance, once the authority has held a meeting with the accountable manager and is satisfied with its results.

AMC M.B.702 (b) Initial approval
1.  
The competent authority should indicate approval of the continuing airworthiness management exposition in writing.

2.  
Contracts for sub-contracting continuing airworthiness management tasks by continuing airworthiness management organisations should be included in the continuing airworthiness management exposition. The competent authorities should verify that the standards set forth in AMC M.A.201(h)1 are being met when approving the exposition.

3.  
The competent authority while investigating the acceptability of the proposed subcontracted continuing airworthiness management tasks arrangements will take into account, in the subcontracted organisation, all other such contracts that are in place irrespective of state of registry in terms of sufficiency of resources, expertise, management structure, facilities and liaison between the contracting continuing airworthiness management organisation, the subcontracted organisation and where applicable contracted Part-145 maintenance organisation(s).

AMC M.B.702 (c) Initial approval
1.  
The competent authority should determine by whom, and how the audit shall be conducted. For example, it will be necessary to determine whether one large team audit or a short series of small team audits or a long series of single man audits are most appropriate for the particular situation.

2.  
The audit may be carried out on a product line type basis. For example, in the case of an organisation with Airbus A320 and Airbus A310 ratings, the audit is concentrated on one type only for a full compliance check. Dependant upon the result, the second type may only require a sample check that should at least cover the activities identi-fied as weak for the first type.
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(10)