Reference to the engine type installed in the aircraft may or may not be included, as necessary.
In all cases, the competent authority should be satisfied that the organisation has the capability to manage the requested types/groups/series.
AMC M.B.703 (a) Issue of approval
1.  For approvals involving more than one competent authority, the approval should be granted in conjunction with the competent authority of the Member States in whose territories the other continuing airworthiness management organisation facilities are located. For practical reasons the initial approval should be granted on the basis of a joint audit visit by the approving competent authority and competent authority of the Member States in whose territories the other continuing airworthiness manage-ment organisation facilities are located. Audits related to the renewal of the approval should be delegated to the competent authority of the Member States in whose ter-ritories the other continuing airworthiness management organisation facilities are located. The resulting audit form and recommendation should then be submitted to the approving competent authority.
AMC M.B.703 (c) Issue of approval
The numeric sequence should be unique to the particular M.A. Subpart G Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation.
ED 2010/002/R ED 2008/013/R
Section B
PART-M
Subpart G

M.B.704 Continuing oversight
(a)
The competent authority shall keep and update a program listing for each M.A. Subpart G approved continuing airworthiness organisations under its supervision, the dates when audit visits are due and when such visits were carried out.

(b)
Each organisation shall be completely audited at periods not exceeding 24 months.

(c)  
A relevant sample of the aircraft managed by the M.B. Subpart G approved organi-sation shall be surveyed in every 24 month period. The size of the sample will be decided by the competent authority based on the result of prior audits and earlier product surveys.

(d)
All findings shall be confirmed in writing to the applicant organisation.

(e)
The competent authority shall record all findings, closure actions (actions required to close a finding) and recommendations.

(f)  
A meeting with the accountable manager shall be convened at least once every 24 months to ensure he/she remains informed of significant issues arising during audits.

AMC M.B.704 (b) Continuing oversight
1.  
Where the competent authority has decided that a series of audit visits are necessary to arrive at a complete audit of an approved continuing airworthiness management organisation, the program should indicate which aspects of the approval will be cov-ered on each visit.

2.  
It is recommended that part of an audit concentrates on two ongoing aspects of the

M.A. Subpart G approval, namely the organisations internal self monitoring quality reports produced by the quality monitoring personnel to determine if the organisa-tion is identifying and correcting its problems and secondly the number of conces-sions granted by the quality manager.

3.  
At the successful conclusion of the audit(s) including verification of the exposition, an audit report form should be completed by the auditing surveyor including all recorded findings, closure actions and recommendation. An EASA Form 13 should be used for this activity.

4.  
Credit may be claimed by the competent authority Surveyor(s) for specific item audits completed during the preceding 23 month period subject to four conditions:

a  the specific item audit should be the same as that required by M.A. Subpart G latest amendment, and
b  there should be satisfactory evidence on record that such specific item audits were carried out and that all corrective actions have been taken, and
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(12)