曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

(2) Personnel requirements consist of two crew chiefs per aircraft, three fuel handlers (single
point refueling) or four fuel handlers (dual point refueling), three rearming personnel,
combat lifesaver or medic, and security personnel (as required based on METT-T).
(3) Aircraft load configuration is based on METT-T.
(4) A minimum of two aircraft should be used for the most efficient and rapid operation.
(5) See Figure E-2 for the single and dual point UH-60 FARPs.
FM 1-113 Appendix E
E-4
Legend: See the glossary for acronyms and abbreviations.
Figure E-2. UH-60 FARP site
FM 1-113 Appendix E
E-5
APPENDIX F
RISK MANAGEMENT/RISK ASSESSMENT
Tough, realistic training conducted to standard is the cornerstone of Army warfighting skills. An intense
training environment stresses both soldiers and equipment, creating a high potential for accidents. The
potential for accidents increases as training realism increases, just as it does in combat. The end result is
the same, the soldier or asset is lost. Commanders must find ways to protect individuals, crews, teams,
and equipment from accidents during training and combat. How well they do this could be the decisive
factor in winning or losing. Risk management is a commonsense tool that leaders can use to make smart
risk decisions in tactical and everyday operations. It is a method of getting the job done by identifying
the areas that present the highest risk and taking action to eliminate, reduce, or control the risk. It is not
complex, technical, or difficult. It is a comparatively simple decision making process, a way of thinking
through a mission to balance mission demands against risks.
F-1. COMMAND RESPONSIBILITIES
The commanders are responsible for effectively managing risk. They must--
Willingly determine the proper balance that will achieve optimum performance from their
command.
l  
l   Select the best risk-reduction options from those that the staff provides.
l   Accept or reject residual risk, based on perceived benefits.
l   Recommend appropriate control measures.
l   Train and motivate leaders at all levels to effectively use risk management concepts.
l   Ensure that risk controls are integrated into plans and orders.
Ensure that unnecessary safety restrictions are eliminated to maximize training and combat
effectiveness.
l  
l   Maintain a total commitment to mission accomplishment and the welfare of subordinates.
l   Use the risk management process to identify, assess, and control hazards for their mission.
l   Report risks beyond their control or authority to their superiors for resolution.
F-2. INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITIES
Each individual soldier must--
Understand, accept, and implement risk reduction guidance and the concept of risk management
and assessment.
l  
l   Maintain a constant awareness of the changing risks associated with the operation.
FM 1-113 Appendix F
F-1
l   Make leaders immediately aware of any unrealistic risk reduction procedure
l   Report risks beyond their control or authority to their superiors for resolution.
F-3. FIVE-STEP RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
a. Step 1. Identify Hazards. Identify the major events that are expected to occur during the
operation and the hazards associated with all specified and implied tasks. The staff reviews and
expands, as appropriate, the list of hazards and major events during the training or combat
scenario. This procedure helps to ensure that all significant hazards have been identified, and the
staff can determine the appropriate force protection measures.
b. Step 2. Assess Hazards.
(1) Hazards are assessed based on their probability of occurrence and severity of effect.
Based on this assessment, the staff can--
l   Determine the level of risk associated with a given hazard.
l   Decide where are when control measures are appropriate to protect the force.
(2) Risk assessment matrices provide a simple analysis method of subdividing an operation
into its major operational events to discover areas where the staff might eliminate or reduce
risk. Each unit should develop its own risk assessment matrix with applicable major
operational events similar to the one shown in TC 1-210. Units can use the risk assessment
matrix alone or with other analysis techniques. The matrix is nearly always more effective
than intuitive methods in identifying the extent of risk. When using a risk-assessment
matrix, the risk assessor must--
Review each situation to ensure he has evaluated all significant areas of concern, even if the
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：運輸直升機操作手冊(58)