曝光臺 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

determined by each team member rating all members of the team individually, for the contribution that
each made to team performance. In short, the individual members of a team may not share equally in
the point total earned by that team; members who are evaluated (by each other) as having contributed
more or less to the team effort will get proportionately more or less points. The form you’ll use is
below.
In rating the members of his/her team, the team member apportions a point total equal to 100
points per team member of the team. The points awarded to each team member are totaled and divided
by 100 times the number of team members.
Example: A student in a 4-member group receives point scores from 4 team members of 95,
110, 105, and 100. His/her score is 410/400 = 1.03. Assuming that the team earned 15 points out of 20
points available for that assignment, that student's points would be 15.45. Another example: a student
receives scores of 90, 95, 85, 98, and 92. His/her score is 460/500 = .92, which, using the same 15
points, would be 13.8 points.
In apportioning points, you are recognizing possibly differing levels of contribution of
individual team members to the group project. There is no required minimum assignment of points to
a team member (zero points may be awarded in very extreme cases); however, you may not award
more than 110 points to any single team member. If all members of a team gave equal effort to the
project(s), then you would give everyone in your group 100 points.
Equal division of points is the situation I most frequently encounter and it is certainly the ideal
situation -- all of us would prefer to work on teams where output and effort is consistent across all
members of the group. I conduct the peer evaluation on group assignments to aid in deterring, or
minimizing, free-riding by some team members on the greater work effort of colleagues, or to allow
teams to reward particularly productive members.
21
Business Strategy, Karen Schnietz
Peer Evaluation of Industry & Competitor Analysis Assignment
For each member of your team including yourself, please assign a score of 0 – 110 points to reflect that
individual member’s contributions to the Industry & Competitor Analysis. If everyone contributed equally to
the work of the group, then you would award every member 100 points. If one member did nothing – never
showed up to team meetings, never turned in promised assignments, etc, you would probably want to award that
member a very low number of points. It is not possible to give someone more than 110 points. Please provide
very specific reasons for your points if you are not assigning all members of your team virtually the same score.
Please also recall the main goals of this peer evaluation – to deter free-riding before it begins, to impose
costs on individuals who significantly free-ride on other team member’s work, or to reward individuals who
make particularly large contributions to the team. I am not interested in trivial differences in individual
performance. In the vast majority of cases, my teams all rank themselves as 100.
Your Name___________________________________________ Team No. ____
Please give specific reasons (for yourself also) if you assign a score other than 100 to a team member:
1. (Yourself, Points)__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
2. (Name, Points)____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
3. (Name, Points)____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
4. (Name, Points)____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
5. (Name, Points)____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
6. (Name, Points)____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
　
中國航空網(wǎng) m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：航空資料22(27)