曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

told us to go around because we were headed for the
[Wrong] Airport. We climbed back to 2,500 feet, lined up on
the [Right] Airport Runway 31 ILS and landed. [Right]
Airport Runway 31 approach plate carries a warning
about [Wrong] Airport, but I didn’t notice it. In the future,
I will make a careful study of every approach plate, even
when it is “just a visual approach!”
Right Base, Wrong Airport
A B737 crew reported on the hazards of a common
meteorological phenomenon— the sunny, clear day.
■ We were on vectors to the right base for a visual to
Runway 19. I called the field in sight and fully configured
the aircraft. As we were turning to final, Tower advised
that we may be looking at the [Wrong] Airport and called
the [Right] Airport’s position to us. At this point I
discontinued the approach, climbed up to 2,000 feet and
proceeded to the Outer Marker for an uneventful landing
at the [Right] Airport.
Although there were numerous navaids to alert me to my
loss of situational awareness...I saw what I expected to
see.... It would have become obvious that the runway I was
looking at didn’t correlate with my ILS, but the Tower and
my First Officer spoke up first. This event just reinforced
the dangers of complacency on a sunny, VFR day and the
importance of crew assertiveness during flight deviations.
Quick action on the Tower’s part made this more of a
professional embarrassment than a real incident.
Airport Selection II: The Long
and Short of It.
Some Callback readers might be tempted to think, “That
could never happen to me” when reading a report on what
appears to be an “obvious” error. Professionals know
better. Mistakes can happen to anyone. Take this report
■ I took off from [Big City] Airport to go to [Little City]
Airport and pick up a friend.... The information I had
from a fellow pilot was that there was a new runway at
[Little City] Airport. Although I had been there many
times, my last time was over a year ago.... I flew a course
of 080 degrees and climbed to 5,500 feet until I saw the
runway. Then I dropped down three thousand feet and
landed at [Huge] Air Force Base thinking it was the new,
longer runway at [Little City] Airport. The Military Police
took me to Base Operations....
From the Maintenance Desk
The Wrong Parts
This sampling of ASRS reports dealing with the
installation of wrong parts indicates an ongoing problem.
Factors cited in these incidents include failure to verify
part numbers, lack of training, schedule pressure, and
failure to update illustrated parts catalogs and job cards.
■ A B737-200 aircraft requested a constant speed drive
change.... After a late start, the drive unit and generator
were changed.... As the lead mechanic, I recorded the
change in the logbook along with the part number. Later it
was found that the wrong part was used. It was for a
B737-300.... There were several things I overlooked after
the installation due to departure time. The part number
should have been verified, but was overlooked by myself
and others....
■ A cargo fire warning unit was removed from an MD83
and installed on an MD82 aircraft. The MD83 uses part #
xxx and the MD82 uses part # yyy.... When the error was
discovered, I notified the MD80 technician at the next line
station and informed my supervisor and manager that the
wrong part had been installed. I was told that the part
would be removed and replaced.
■ Another technician and I removed and replaced a filler
on a B757 number one engine between fan blades 18 and
19. Later we were told that the wrong filler had been
installed. We had never been trained on the installation of
the annulus fillers. The difference between fillers is the
number of tabs on the blade end. The filler that was
installed was one tab short. The airplane was stopped at
the next line station and the filler error was corrected.
from a private pilot who didn’t notice the difference
between a 13,300 foot military runway and a 4,500 foot
municipal strip. It could happen to anyone. Well...almost
anyone. One thing is certain, it won’t happen to this
pilot...again.
CCAALLLLBBAACCKK From NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System
Number 288 September 2003
A Monthly Safety Bulletin
from
The Office of the NASA
Aviation Safety Reporting
System,
P.O. Box 189,
Moffett Field, CA
94035-0189
http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/
August 2003 Report Intake
Air Carrier / Air Taxi Pilots 1969
General Aviation Pilots 822
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CALL BACK 2(33)