3.  
A person qualified to the AMC M.A.706 subparagraph 4.5 should be considered as holding the equivalent to an aeronautical degree.

4.  
An appropriate licence in compliance with Annex III (Part-66) is a category B1 in the sub-category of the aircraft reviewed or a B2 or a C. It is not necessary to satisfy the experience requirements of Part-66 at the time of the review.

5.  
To hold a position with appropriate responsibilities means the airworthiness review staff should have a position in the organisation independent from the airworthiness management process or with overall authority on the airworthiness management process of complete aircraft.

Independence from the airworthiness management process may be achieved, among other ways, by:
·  Being authorised to perform airworthiness reviews only on aircraft for which the person has not participated in their management. For example, performing airworthiness reviews on a specific model line, while being involved in the air-worthiness management of a different model line.
·  M.A. Subpart G organisations with Part-145/M.A.Subpart F approval, may nomi-nate maintenance personnel from their Part-145/M.A. Subpart F organisation as airworthiness review staff, as long as they are not involved in the airworthiness management of the aircraft. These personnel should not have been involved in the release to service of that particular aircraft (other than maintenance tasks performed during the physical survey of the aircraft or performed as a result of findings discovered during such physical survey) to avoid possible conflict of interests.
·  Nominating as airworthiness review staff personnel from the Quality Department of the continuing airworthiness management organisation.
Overall authority on the airworthiness management process of complete aircraft may be achieved, among other ways, by:
·  Nominating as airworthiness review staff the Accountable Manager or the Maintenance Postholder.
·  Being authorised to perform airworthiness reviews only on those particular air-craft for which the person is responsible for the complete continuing airworthi-ness management process.
·  In the case of one-man organisations, this person has always overall authority. This means that this person can be nominated as airworthiness review staff.
ED 2008/013/R  ED 2010/002/RED 2008/013/R ED 2010/002/R
Section A
PART-M
Subpart G

ED 2008/013/R
AMC M.A.707 (a)(1) Airworthiness review staff

For all aircraft used in commercial air transport and any other aircraft, other than bal-loons, above 2730 kg MTOM, formal aeronautical maintenance training means training (internal or external) supported by evidence on the following subjects:
·  Relevant parts of initial and continuing airworthiness regulations. 
·  Relevant parts of operational requirements and procedures, if applicable. 
·  The organisation’s continuing airworthiness management exposition. 
·  Knowledge of a relevant sample of the type(s) of aircraft gained through a formal-ised training course. These courses should be at least at a level equivalent to Part-66 Appendix III Level 1 General Familiarisation and could be imparted by a Part-147 organisation, by the manufacturer, or by any other organisation accepted by the competent authority. 
“Relevant sample” means that these courses should cover typical systems embodied in those aircraft being within the scope of approval 
·  Maintenance methods. 

AMC M.A.707 (a)(2) Airworthiness review staff

For all balloons and any other aircraft of 2730 Kg MTOM and below, not used in com-mercial air transport:
1.  
“experience in continuing airworthiness” can be full time or part-time, either as pro-fessional or on a voluntary basis.
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 1(56)