曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

ensures proper and correct utilization of all functional check flight procedures.
28.5.2 Formation Flights. Formation flights involving two or more aircraft require a high degree of
crew coordination to ensure mission accomplishment and to reduce mid-air collision potential.
28.6 EMERGENCIES
Mission planning and briefing should address contingencies which may affect the flight. Proper
planning minimizes the effect of deviations from the planned mission. The possibility of a mission
abort, or even the loss of an aircraft or aircrew, can be significantly reduced by anticipating critical
phases of flight and preparing for potential emergency situations. An example is the thorough brief of
bird strike emergencies and divert fields along a low-level navigation route. Part V contains procedures
to correct an abnormal or emergency condition. Modify these procedures as required in cases of
multiple emergencies, adverse weather, or other peculiar factors. Use common sense and sound
judgement to determine the correct course of action.
A1-F18EA-NFM-000
IX-28-4 ORIGINAL
CHAPTER 29
Crew Coordination Standards
29.1 CREW COORDINATION STANDARDS
Data to be provided at a later date.
A1-F18EA-NFM-000
IX-29-1 (Reverse Blank) ORIGINAL

PART X
NATOPS EVALUATION
Chapter 30 - NATOPS Evaluation
A1-F18EA-NFM-000
71 (Reverse Blank) ORIGINAL

CHAPTER 30
NATOPS Evaluation
30.1 CONCEPT
The standard operating procedures prescribed in this manual represent the optimum method of
operating the F/A-18 aircraft. The NATOPS Evaluation is intended to evaluate compliance with
NATOPS procedures by observing and grading individuals and units. This evaluation is tailored for
compatibility with various operational commitments and missions of both Navy and Marine Corps
units. The prime objective of the NATOPS Evaluation program is to assist the unit commanding
officer in improving unit readiness and safety through constructive comment. Maximum benefit from
the NATOPS Program is achieved only through the vigorous support of the program by commanding
officers as well as pilots.
30.1.1 Implementation. The NATOPS Evaluation program shall be carried out in every unit
operating naval aircraft. Pilots desiring to attain/retain qualification in the F/A-18 shall be evaluated
initially in accordance with OPNAV Instruction 3710.7 series, and at least once during the twelve
months following initial and subsequent evaluations. Individual and unit NATOPS Evaluations are
conducted annually; however, instruction in and observation of adherence to NATOPS procedures
must be on a daily basis within each unit to obtain maximum benefits from the program. The NATOPS
Coordinators, Evaluators, and Instructors shall administer the program as outlined in OPNAVINST
3710.7 series. Evaluees who receive a grade of Unqualified on a ground or flight evaluation shall be
allowed 30 days in which to complete a reevaluation. A maximum of 60 days may elapse between the
date the initial ground evaluation was commenced and the date the flight evaluation is satisfactorily
completed.
30.1.2 Definitions. The following terms, used throughout this section, are defined as to their specific
meaning within the NATOPS program.
30.1.2.1 NATOPS Evaluation. A periodic evaluation of individual pilot standardization consisting of
an open book examination, a closed book examination, an oral examination, and a flight evaluation.
30.1.2.2 NATOPS Reevaluation. A partial NATOPS Evaluation administered to a pilot who has
been placed in an Unqualified status by receiving an Unqualified grade for any of his ground
examinations or the flight evaluations. Only those areas in which an unsatisfactory level was noted
need be observed during a reevaluation.
30.1.2.3 Qualified. A qualified evaluation means that a pilot is well standardized and demonstrates
highly professional knowledge of and compliance with NATOPS standards and procedures. Momentary
deviations from or minor omission in non-critical areas are permitted if prompt and timely
remedial action is initiated by the evaluee.
30.1.2.4 Conditionally Qualified. A conditionally qualified evaluation means that a pilot is satisfactorily
standardized. One or more significant deviations from NATOPS standards and procedures, but
had no errors in critical areas and no errors jeopardizing mission accomplishment or flight safety.
30.1.2.5 Unqualified. An unqualified evaluation means that a pilot is not acceptably standardized
and fails to meet minimum standards regarding knowledge of and/or ability to apply NATOPS
A1-F18EA-NFM-000
X-30-1 ORIGINAL
procedures, one or more significant deviations from NATOPS standards and procedures which could
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：NATOPS Flight Manual 飛行手冊 2(122)