曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

is initially positive and at some point crosses zero and becomes negative for higher
644           PERFORMANCE, STABILITY, DYNAMICS, AND CONTROL
+
0
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃         Auto-                                            ┃
┃                                                          ┃
┃[-~-..                                                    ┃
┣━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┫
┃\\ \Dm                                                 -  ┃
┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
Fig. 7.7    Schematic variation of yawing moment coefficient of a rotating fuselage.
values of the angular velocity l02. Let 92 : SZc when CfZ - O. We observe that
for 0 < S2 < S2c, CfZ  > O, which implies that the induced yawing moment wiU_
assist the imparted disturbance, and, for t2 >  92c, Cfl  < 0, the induced yawing
moment will oppose the rotation. Hence, the angular velocitjr <2c when Cn - 0 is
the steady-state or equilibrium autorotational speed. If the variation of Ccz curve
is of type II, then the body does not autorotate. It is resistant to autorotat:ion.
   The side force variations that can give type I'and t}rpe n variations of the
yawing moment are shown in Fig. 7.8. The type A variation of side force has a
positive value of side force forlow values ofthe crossflow angle, and the side force
becomes'negative for higher values of the crossflow angle. This type of side force
variation generates autorotative (yawing) moments on sections close to the center
of gravity and damping (yawing) moments for sections away from the center of
gravity. Equilibrium or steady autorotation speed is reached wvhen the autorotafive
moments balance the damping moments so that the net yawing moment on the
                                                                                    J
body is zero. For type B, the side force coe:fficient is always negative, leading
to damping (yawing) moments at all cross sections. This corresponds to type II
variation of Cn vs 02 as shown in Fig. 7.7.
      The cross-sectional shapes having rounded bottom srrrfaces (Fig. 7.9) generally
have type B side force coePfficient variation, and those having flat bottom surfaces
have ty;e A side force coefficient variation. Rounding the top surface while the
bottom surface is kept fiat enhances the autorotational tendency.
      The Reynolds number is known to have a sigruficant infiuence on the side force
characteristics of noncircular cylinders.9 For certain cross-sectional shapes, the
side force variation changes from type A to type B as the Reynolds number is
increased. Thus, it is quite possible that a spin-tunnel model may indicate that
the configuration is prospin, whereas full-scale airl,lane may exhibit an antispin
behavior.
+
O
INERTIA COUPLING AND SPIN
                     
┏━━━━━━━━━┓
┃/---< ++          ┃
┣━━━━━━━━━┫
┃ ~\l@r~~ 1t     - ┃
┗━━━━━━━━━┛
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：PERFORMANCE, STABILITY, DYNAMICS, AND CONTROL4(33)