曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

performing satisfactory. To check the design further, we perform a simulation for
the complete fifth-order system as shown in Fig. 6.39b. We observe that the design
is satisfactory. The difference in the steady-state behaviors is due to the approxi-
mations irrvolved in deriving Dutch-roll transfer functions as we have discussed
earlier.
6.5.4  Full-State Feedback Design for Lateral-Directional Stabr7ity
       Augmentation System
   In this section we will design a full-state feedback control law for a lateral-
directional stability augmentation system. Such a flight control system needs that
all five state variables p, ~, p, p, and r be accurately measured and be available
for feedback. The roll and yaw angles can be accurately measured by positional
gyros and the roll and yaw rates by the rate gyros. The sideslip angle is perhaps the
most difficult one to measure. A vane-type instrument is usually used to measure
the sideslip but, like angle of attack sensor, itis also subject to positional errors due
to fuselage sidewash. Another method used to obtain sideslip is the integration of
~
o,
:d
E
608            PERFORMANCE, STABILITY, DYNAMICS, AND CONTROL
accelerometer outputs. However, this is also subject to measurement noise. In any
case, it is essential that the sideslip be accurately estimated and be available for
feedback. For our purpose, we will assume that all five state variables are measured
accurately and are available for feedback.
   Let us consider the oeneral aviation airplane once again and assume that the
desired poles of the lateral-directional closed-loop characteristic equations are as
follows.
      For Dutch-roll mode, let
                              Adr - -1.21- j2.75                      (6.337)
so that we have a damping ratio of 0.4 and a natural frequency Crh of 3.0 rad/s,
corresponding to level I Dutch-roll flying qualities.
     For roll subsidence and spiral mode, let
                                  A,r - -8.0                          (6.338)
                                 \sp - -0.05                         (6.339)
The other root is the zero root, A - O.
    We have a roll-time constant of 0.125, which gives level I fiying qualities for
the roll-subsidence mode. The spiral mode is damped and, therefore, it also has
level I fiying qualities. Thus, overall, the assumed pole locations give us level I
lateral-directional fiying qualities.
      For these values of five roots, the desired lateral- directional characteristic equa-
tion is given by
S(S4 +  10.9080 S3 + 29.4897 S2 + 76.7565 s + 0.6122) : O             (6.340)
       The objective is to design a full-state feedbacklaw so that the closed-loop lateral-
directional characteristic equation of the general aviation airplane is identical to
the desired characteristic equation.
    From Eqs. (6.196) and (6.197), we have
    -0.2557 0.1820   0   0 -1.0000
      0     O     1.0   0   0
A- -16.1572   O   ~8.4481 O 2.2048    '(6.341)
       O      O     O   0   1.0
      4.5440    O ,  -0.3517 0 -0.7647
       0    0.0712
    0    0
B -.  29.3013   2.5764
    O    0
    -0.2243 -4.6477
(6.342)
AIRPLANE RESPONSE AND CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL          609
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：PERFORMANCE, STABILITY, DYNAMICS, AND CONTROL4(12)