曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

altitude
quantization,
instead
of
simply
increasing
the
measurement
noise
[54].
Additionally,
the distribution of the joint advisory state variable sRA can serve as an indication of the “mode” of .ight of the intruder. Using this extra information can result in improved estimation of the intruder altitude and vertical rate when the intruder is equipped with a collision avoidance system.

REFERENCES

[1] R. Chamlou, “Future airborne collision avoidance: Design principles, analysis plan and algo-rithm development,” in Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Orlando, FL (2009), pp. 6.E.2.1–
6.E.2.17.
[2] R. Chamlou, “Design principles and algorithm development for two types of NextGen air-borne con.ict detection and collision avoidance,” in Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference, Herndon, VA (2010), pp. N7.1–N7.12.
[3] G. Dowek, A. Geser, and C. Mu.oz, “Tactical con.ict detection and resolution in a 3-D airspace,” in 4th USA/Europe Air Tra.c Management R&D Seminar, Santa Fe, New Mexico (2001).
[4] K.D. Bilimoria, “A geometric optimization approach to aircraft con.ict resolution,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Denver, Colo. (2000).
[5] J.M. Shewchun, J.H. Oh, and E. Feron, “Linear matrix inequalities for free .ight con.ict problems,” in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA (1997), vol. 3, pp. 2417–2422.
[6] R. Lachner, “Collision avoidance as a di.erential game: Real-time approximation of opti-mal strategies using higher derivatives of the value function,” in International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Orlando, FL (1997), vol. 3, pp. 2308–2313.
[7] R. Teo and C. Tomlin, “Computing provably safe aircraft to aircraft spacing for closely spaced parallel approaches,” in Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Philadelphia, PA (2000), vol. 1, pp. 2D2/1–2D2/9.
[8] S. Temizer, M.J. Kochenderfer, L.P. Kaelbling, T. Lozano-Pérez, and J.K. Kuchar, “Colli-sion avoidance for unmanned aircraft using Markov decision processes,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, Canada (2010).
[9] T.B. Wolf, Aircraft collision avoidance using Monte Carlo Real-Time Belief Space Search, Mas-ter’s thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technol-ogy (2009).
[10] L.F. Winder and J.K. Kuchar, “Hazard avoidance alerting with Markov decision processes,” International Center for Air Transportation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technical Rep. ICAT-2004-4 (2004).
[11] J.K. Kuchar and L.C. Yang, “A review of con.ict detection and resolution modeling methods,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 1(4), 179–189 (2000).
[12] M.J.  Kochenderfer, J.P. Chryssanthacopoulos, L.P. Kaelbling, and T. Lozano-Perez, “Model-based optimization of airborne collision avoidance logic,” Massachusetts In-stitute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory, Project Report ATC-360 (2010), URL
http://www.ll.mit.edu/mission/aviation/publications/publication-files/
atc-reports/Kochenderfer_2010_ATC-360_WW-18658.pdf.

[13] J.P. Chryssanthacopoulos, M.J. Kochenderfer, and R.E. Williams, “Improved Monte Carlo sampling for con.ict probability estimation,” in AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Confer-ence, Orlando, Florida (2010).
[14] L.C. Yang and J.K. Kuchar, “Prototype con.ict alerting system for free .ight,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 20(4), 768–773 (1997).
[15] B.D. Carpenter and J.K. Kuchar, “Probability-based collision alerting logic for closely-spaced parallel approach,” in AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV (1997).
　
中國航空網 m.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Robust Airborne Collision Avoidance through Dynamic Programm(55)